How has the recent turmoil within the OpenAI offices changed your plans to use GPT in a business process or product in 2024?
Increased uncertainty means we are more likely to evaluate alternative AI chatbots and LLMs.
No change in plans, though we will keep an eye on the situation.
With Sam Altman back in charge, we are more likely to go all-in with GPT and LLMs.
What recent turmoil?
AI / Data / Security

LLMs and Data Privacy: Navigating the New Frontiers of AI

AI presents challenges for data privacy in Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT emphasizing the need for robust security measures.
Sep 27th, 2023 10:00am by
Featued image for: LLMs and Data Privacy: Navigating the New Frontiers of AI

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are revolutionizing how we interact online, offering unmatched efficiency and personalization. But as these AI-driven tools become more prevalent, they bring significant concerns about data privacy to the forefront. With models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT becoming staples in our digital interactions, the need for robust confidentiality measures is more pressing than ever.

I have been thinking about security for generative AI lately. Not because I have tons of private data but because my clients do. I also need to be mindful of taking their data and manipulating it or analyzing it in SaaS-based LLMs, as doing so could breach privacy. Numerous cautionary tales exist already of professionals doing this either knowingly or unknowingly. Among my many goals in life, being a cautionary tale isn’t one of them.

Current AI Data Privacy Landscape

Despite the potential of LLMs, there’s growing apprehension about their approach to data privacy. For instance, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, while powerful, refines its capabilities using user data and sometimes shares this with third parties. Platforms like Anthropic’s Claude and Google’s Bard have retention policies that might not align with users’ data privacy expectations. These practices highlight an industry-wide need for a more user-centric approach to data handling.

The digital transformation wave has seen generative AI tools emerge as game-changers. Some industry pundits even compare their transformative impact to landmark innovations like the internet. The impact of the internet is likely to be just as great, if not greater. As the adoption of LLM applications and tools skyrockets, there’s a glaring gap: preserving the privacy of data processed by these models by securing the inputs of training data and any data the model outputs. This presents a unique challenge. While LLMs require vast data to function optimally, they must also navigate a complex web of data privacy regulations.

Legal Implications and LLMs

The proliferation of LLMs hasn’t escaped the eyes of regulatory bodies. Frameworks like the EU AI Act, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) have set stringent data sharing and retention standards. These regulations aim to protect user data, but they also pose challenges for LLM developers and providers, emphasizing the need for innovative solutions that prioritize user privacy.

Top LLM Data Privacy Threats

In August, the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) released the Top 10 for LLM Applications 2023, a comprehensive guide to the most critical security risks to LLM applications. One such concern is training data poisoning. This happens when changes to data or process adjustments introduce vulnerabilities, biases, or even backdoors. These modifications can endanger the security and ethical standards of the model. To tackle this, confirming the genuineness of the training data’s supply chain is vital.

Using sandboxing can help prevent unintended data access, and it’s crucial to vet specific training datasets rigorously. Another challenge is supply chain vulnerabilities. The core foundation of LLMs, encompassing training data, ML models and deployment platforms, can be at risk due to weaknesses in the supply chain. Addressing this requires a comprehensive evaluation of data sources and suppliers. Relying on trusted plugins and regularly engaging in adversarial testing ensures the system remains updated with the latest security measures.

Sensitive information disclosure is another challenge. LLMs might unintentionally disclose confidential data, leading to privacy concerns. To mitigate this risk, it’s essential to use data sanitization techniques. Implementing strict input validation processes and hacker-driven adversarial testing can help identify potential vulnerabilities.

Enhancing LLMs with plugins can be beneficial but also introduce security concerns due to insecure plugin design. These plugins can become potential gateways for security threats. To ensure these plugins remain secure, it’s essential to have strict input guidelines and robust authentication methods. Continuously testing these plugins for security vulnerabilities is also crucial.

Lastly, the excessive agency in LLMs can be problematic. Giving too much autonomy to these models can lead to unpredictable and potentially harmful outputs. It’s essential to set clear boundaries on the tools and permissions granted to these models to prevent such outcomes. Functions and plugins should be clearly defined, and human oversight should always be in place, especially for significant actions.

Three Approaches to LLM Security

There isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to LLM security. It’s a balancing act between how you want to interact with both internal and external sources of information and the users of those models. For example, you may want a customer-facing and internal chatbot to collate private institutional knowledge.

Data Contagion Within Large Language Models (LLMs)

Data contagion of Large Language Models (LLMs) is the accidental dissemination of confidential information via a model’s inputs. Given the intricate nature of LLMs and their expansive training datasets, ensuring that these computational models do not inadvertently disclose proprietary or sensitive data is imperative.

In the contemporary digital landscape, characterized by frequent data breaches and heightened privacy concerns, mitigating data contagion is essential. An LLM that inadvertently discloses sensitive data poses substantial risks, both in terms of reputational implications for entities and potential legal ramifications.

One approach to address this challenge encompasses refining the training datasets to exclude sensitive information, ensuring periodic model updates to rectify potential vulnerabilities and adopting advanced methodologies capable of detecting and mitigating risks associated with data leakage.

Sandboxing Technique LLMs

Sandboxing is another strategy to keep data safe when working with AI models. Sandboxing entails the creation of a controlled computational environment wherein a system or application operates, ensuring that its actions and outputs remain isolated and don’t make their way outside of the systems.

For LLMs, the application of sandboxing is particularly salient. By establishing a sandboxed environment, entities can regulate access to the model’s outputs, ensuring interactions are limited to authorized users or systems. This strategy enhances security by preventing unauthorized access and potential model misuse.

With over 300,000 plus models available on HuggingFace and exceptionally powerful large-language models readily available, it’s within reason for those enterprises that have the means to deploy their own EnterpriseGPT that can remain private.

Effective sandboxing necessitates the implementation of stringent access controls, continuous monitoring of interactions with the LLM and establishing defined operational parameters to ensure the model’s actions remain within prescribed limits.

Data Obfuscation Before LLM Input

The technique of “obfuscation” has emerged as a prominent strategy in data security. Obfuscation pertains to modifying original data to render it unintelligible to unauthorized users while retaining its utility for computational processes. In the context of LLMs, this implies altering data to remain functional for the model but become inscrutable for potential malicious entities. Given the omnipresent nature of digital threats, obfuscating data before inputting it into an LLM is a protective measure. In the event of unauthorized access, the obfuscated data, devoid of its original context, offers minimal value to potential intruders.

Several methodologies are available for obfuscation, such as data masking, tokenization and encryption. It is vital to choose a technique that aligns with the operational requirements of the LLM and the inherent nature of the data being processed. Selecting the right approach ensures optimal protection while preserving the integrity of the information.

In conclusion, as LLMs continue to evolve and find applications across diverse sectors, ensuring their security and the integrity of the data they process remains paramount. Proactive measures, grounded in rigorous academic and technical research, are essential to navigate the challenges posed by this dynamic domain.

OpaquePrompts: Open Source Obfuscation for LLMs

In response to these challenges, OpaquePrompts has recently been released on Github by Opaque Systems. It preserves the privacy of user data by sanitizing it, ensuring that personal or sensitive details are removed before interfacing with the LLM. By harnessing advanced technologies such as confidential computing and trusted execution environments (TEEs), OpaquePrompts guarantees that only the application developer can access the full scope of the prompt’s data. OpaquePrompts’s suite of tools is available on GitHub for those interested in delving deeper.

OpaquePrompts is engineered for scenarios demanding insights from user-provided contexts. Its workflow is comprehensive:

  • User Input Processing: LLM applications create a prompt, amalgamating retrieved-context, memory and user queries, which is then relayed to OpaquePrompts.
  • Identification of Sensitive Data: Within a secure TEE, OpaquePrompts utilizes advanced NLP techniques to detect and flag sensitive tokens in a prompt.
  • Prompt Sanitization: All identified sensitive tokens are encrypted, ensuring the sanitized prompt can be safely relayed to the LLM.
  • Interaction with LLM: The sanitized prompt is processed by the LLM, which then returns a similarly sanitized response.
  • Restoring Original Data: OpaquePrompts restores the original data in the response, ensuring users receive accurate and relevant information.

The Future: Merging Confidentiality with LLMs

In the rapidly evolving landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs), the intersection of technological prowess and data privacy has emerged as a focal point of discussion. As LLMs, such as ChatGPT, become integral to our digital interactions, the imperative to safeguard user data has never been more pronounced. While these models offer unparalleled efficiency and personalization, they also present challenges in terms of data security and regulatory compliance.

Solutions like OpaquePrompts are one of many that will come that exemplify how data privacy at the prompt layer can be a game-changer. Instead of venturing into the daunting task of self-hosting a Foundational Model, LLM focusing on prompt-layer privacy provides data confidentiality from the get-go without requiring the expertise and costs associated with in-house model serving. This simplifies LLM integration and reinforces user trust, underscoring the commitment to data protection.

It is evident that as we embrace the boundless potential of LLMs, a concerted effort is required to ensure that data privacy is not compromised. The future of LLMs hinges on this delicate balance, where technological advancement and data protection coalesce to foster trust, transparency and transformative experiences for all users.

Group Created with Sketch.
THE NEW STACK UPDATE A newsletter digest of the week’s most important stories & analyses.