Will JavaScript type annotations kill TypeScript?
The creators of Svelte and Turbo 8 both dropped TS recently saying that "it's not worth it".
Yes: If JavaScript gets type annotations then there's no reason for TypeScript to exist.
No: TypeScript remains the best language for structuring large enterprise applications.
TBD: The existing user base and its corpensource owner means that TypeScript isn’t likely to reach EOL without a putting up a fight.
I hope they both die. I mean, if you really need strong types in the browser then you could leverage WASM and use a real programming language.
I don’t know and I don’t care.
CI/CD / Open Source / Software Development

The Story Behind Capital One’s Fork of an Open Source Project

Jul 31st, 2017 2:45pm by and
Featued image for: The Story Behind Capital One’s Fork of an Open Source Project

For large open source projects, it can be difficult to manage all of the pull requests that come in from different parties, so, naturally, the need to automate the approval of pull requests has led to the creation of several open source projects. LGTM (Looks Good to Me) is one such automated system, built around GitHub. It locks pull requests from being merged upstream until a given number of approvals have been received.

LGTM does not come pre-configured for being bolted into certain implementers’ existing tool chains. Now, as it is a general-purpose project, perhaps no one should expect it to be configured this way. But then what’s the purpose of the open source development process if not to open up integration capabilities to implementers?

At the last OSCON conference, Capital One lead software engineer Jon Bodner tells the story of how LGTM’s principal developer gave his team his blessing to produce a fork that adds functionality that may be more specific not just to Capital One or another financial institution, but any organization of its magnitude.

“When you have pull requests, you want to make sure there’s been some sort of code review, that somebody’s actually checked to make sure that you’re merging in something that’s been validated,” Bodner explained to The New Stack’s Alex Williams. “And oftentimes people see pull requests, they merge it, they’re done. But you don’t really know who’s doing that merging. It could be the same person who did the pull requests in the first place. And at bigger places like Capital One, you want to have some sort of control over the process.”

Learn more about how Bodner’s efforts could lead to a more role-based, policy-oriented request management system, in this edition of The New Stack Makers podcast from the last OSCON in Austin, Texas.

The Story Behind Capital One’s Fork Of An Open Source Project

In This Edition:

1:00: Bodner’s presentation at OSCON 2017.
5:33: Capital One’s internal open source process.
9:18: How Capital One uses Boolean logic.
13:47: What iterative patterns Capital One is building upon.
14:48: What gaps Bodner is seeing in the software development process.
16:42: How Capital One captures knowledge for its future projects long-term.

Capital One is a sponsor of The New Stack.

Group Created with Sketch.
TNS owner Insight Partners is an investor in: The New Stack.
THE NEW STACK UPDATE A newsletter digest of the week’s most important stories & analyses.