Will JavaScript type annotations kill TypeScript?
The creators of Svelte and Turbo 8 both dropped TS recently saying that "it's not worth it".
Yes: If JavaScript gets type annotations then there's no reason for TypeScript to exist.
No: TypeScript remains the best language for structuring large enterprise applications.
TBD: The existing user base and its corpensource owner means that TypeScript isn’t likely to reach EOL without a putting up a fight.
I hope they both die. I mean, if you really need strong types in the browser then you could leverage WASM and use a real programming language.
I don’t know and I don’t care.
Tech Life

Tech Leaders Ask Texas Governor to Halt Discriminatory Legislation

Jun 1st, 2017 7:00am by
Featued image for: Tech Leaders Ask Texas Governor to Halt Discriminatory Legislation

Fourteen tech heavy hitters sent Texas Governor Greg Abbott a letter declaring a “steadfast opposition” to what they view as discriminatory legislation in Texas.

“Such laws are bad for our employees and bad for business,” the letter states. They could inhibit tech conferences from setting up in the state — a growing source of revenue for Austin in particular. They could also pressure Texas tech industries — which like all tech companies are desperately seeking top talent — to relocate elsewhere

CEOs from Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Google, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Salesforce, Dell, Gearbox Software, the GSD&M advertising agency, Silicon Labs, specialty materials company Celanese Corporation, and Cisco all signed the petition.

The letter seems to be in response to Senate Bill 6, and its companion HB 2899, the “bathroom bill,” which is similar to a bill passed in North Carolina last year. Simply stated, the legislation requires a person to use a public restroom, locker room, or similar facility based on the sex stated on their birth certificate, making it a crime for transgender people to use facilities for the sex with which they identify and most often present to the world. It also specifically bans municipalities and school districts from enacting or enforcing trans-inclusive bathroom policies.

For many in the IT community, the consequences of this bill seem beyond severe. Not only can transgender people, attending a tech conference in the state, be arrested and jailed for using the bathroom, but they will be assumed to be pedophiles, and be put on the Texas sexual predator watch list. So not only is there the possibility of being hauled off to jail during a conference, the arrest will ruin the rest of your life. Just because you need to pass some water.

The bill is similar to North Carolina’s SB11 Bathroom Bill, which was partially repealed in March in an effort to keep the NCAA from leaving the state. According to the Associated Press, North Carolina is projected to lose $3.76 billion dollars over the next several years because of opposition to the law.

The Texas bill has been condemned by hundreds of businesses and several Texas chambers of commerce, celebrities and performers, tourism groups and sports organizations including the NBA, the NFL and the NCAA. The tech world, rooted in Austin has taken note. It has also been denounced by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation(CNCF) and several tech conference organizers have already signaled their plans to not return to Austin if the bill is signed into law. Austin alone is hosting 70 tech conferences this year.

Abbot has indicated that he will sign the bill, if passed.

Patrick promised to push for a special session, should the bathroom bill not pass. It stalled in the state Senate after being mended by the House in response to the outpouring of concern from the business community over loss of business if the bill passed. The revised bill only addressed trans children using restrooms in public schools; a move that Republican House Speaker Joe Straus thought “will allow us to avoid the severely negative impact of Senate Bill 6.

The bill was sent back to the Senate for approval, where it was rejected.

Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, a conservative Republican, has made a priority of seeing these bills become law. According to the Human Rights Commission Patrick has made “a career out of his anti-LGBTQ animus.” According to the Texas Freedom Network, SB6 is just one of  25 anti-LGBT bills filed in the current legislative session are about hate and discrimination. That includes the 17 bills that would allow government, private individuals and businesses to use their personal religious beliefs as a cover for discriminating against LGBT Texans.

Among the bills championed by Patrick this year, include:

  • HB 3859 called the religious refusal foster care bill gives faith-based foster care and adoption agencies the right to refuse to place children in households over religious objections. The bill is aimed towards LGBT parents, but the language is such that it could also include legal discrimination against Muslims and Jews. This comes at a time when the Texas is transferring responsibility for child welfare from the state to local organizations, many of whom are Christian-based. “It is unconscionable that a bill would prioritize discrimination over the best interest of kids in the child welfare system,” said Marty Rouse, of the Human Rights Campaign, “but Texas lawmakers have done just that.”
  • Senate Bill 651, which would allow private individuals employed in more than 65 licensed occupations to deny services to potential customers based on the provider’s “sincerely held religious belief.” Physicians and therapists are included in this group, so it would be legal for a doctor to deny emergency medical services to anyone. Jennifer Pizer, the law and policy director for Lambda Legal calls the bill is “breathtaking” in its virtually unlimited scope.
  • Senate Bill 4, aimed at eliminating sanctuary cities. This bill, just signed, is already headed for the courts. The ACLU joined the lawsuit and has published a national “travel advisory” warning that visitors to Texas may have their constitutional rights violated.

“As large employers in the state of Texas,” the letter says, “we are gravely concerned that any such legislation would deeply tarnish Texas’ reputation as open and friendly to businesses and families. Our ability to attract, recruit, and retain top talent, encourage new business relocations, expansions and investment, and maintain our economic competitiveness would all be negatively affected… we strongly urge you and the Texas legislature not to further pursue legislation of this kind.”

The letter comes as the 2017 legislative session ends. The Texas Legislature is limited to 140 calendar days and will not be in session again until 2019. Abbot has three weeks to sign the bills on his desk (or not) and is currently deciding on whether to call a special legislative session. A special session can be as long as 30 days and the governor has sole discretion as to the bills to be discussed.

“Discrimination is wrong,” says the letter, “and has no place in Texas or anywhere in our country. Our perspective is grounded in our values and our long-held commitment to diversity and inclusion.”

Feature image via Pixabay.

Group Created with Sketch.
TNS owner Insight Partners is an investor in: Simply.
THE NEW STACK UPDATE A newsletter digest of the week’s most important stories & analyses.